Is the Danger of Deep Fakes Fake News?

As artificial intelligence continues to advance alongside our other technological capabilities, some dangers have come to light. With all the discussion surrounding the current presidency and its relationship with the media and "fake news", AI and its ability to produce what are known as "Deep Fakes" have been cause for concern. According to the Wikipedia page on deep fakes, they are described as "synthetic media in which a person in an existing image, video, or audio is replaced with someone else's likeness." Using deep learning, these programs study photographs and videos of an individual in order to learn their typical facial movements and speech patterns in order to produce an artificial version of them.

Image result for deep fake comparisons

Of course, with many of these new advancements, they start with good intentions. Deep fakes can be used for lighthearted fun like seeing a celebrity sing a funny song, or seeing what it might be like for one of your favorite actors play parts they were not cast in. In the above photo, which is a screenshot of a deep fake program, you can see Jim Carrey's face on Jack Nicholson's character, Jack Torrance, from "The Shining". You can also see a full video here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=30&v=8OJnkJqkyio&feature=emb_logo which is a deep fake version of "Back to the Future" with Tom Holland playing Marty Mcfly and Robert Downey Jr. playing Doc. The issues arise when this ability gets into the wrong hands. These deep fakes can also be used to spread manipulative and false information. There are already a few real life examples of how these applications can be used to manipulate its audience. Deep fake videos are being created of political and company leaders from around the world. In June of 2019, congress began an investigation of deep fakes after a concern was raised about their potential effect on elections. A video of Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, which was a cheap fake (a simply doctored version of an existing video) rather than a deep fake, created a comotion on social media which led to the discussion in congress. As stated by the CNN article, no deep fakes of US politicians have been used to spread false information with malintent or create a deceptive campaign, however this does not mean that the capabilities are not there. In fact, it has already been used in the Legislative Assembly Elections in Delhi. Candidate, Manoj Tiwari and his campaign team used deep fakes to produce multiple versions of his campaign video to distribute to different audiences. He created the original video, and then used deep learning to create two fake videos. One of them in english, and the other in the Hindi language, Haryanvi, in order to sway the local Haryanvi speakers to vote for him instead of the rival candidate even though he was not a native speaker. The possibility is there for these incredible technologies to be used for the wrong intent. We must decide now on whether or not these technologies should continue to be advanced and how to regulate them, as well as protect the public from this source of "fake news." Do you believe that deep fakes provide a greater risk than benefit to society?

Comments

  1. Really cool topic, Chase. To answer your question, I do think that deep fakes provide a greater risk than benefit to society. Even though it should be common sense to not believe everything you see/read on the the internet, our society has an ever increasing amount of people getting their news and current events from their phones/social media, and with AI like Deep Fakes reputations can be ruined with false information being shown.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with Sam that it's more harmful than helpful. There are countless ways that this technology could be abused to spread propaganda and misinformation, but there aren't any real benefits that I can think of. Are there any benefits besides silly videos?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I looked into some more benefits of deep fakes after realising the only one I had mentioned was the fun youtube videos. Must have been my bias showing. They do have potential benefits absolutely! One way people are looking forward to this is in the healthcare field. More and more practices are accepting patients through video for diagnosis with online doctors such as Amwell. In hopes of protecting patient privacy, hospitals with enough computing power could create thousands of fake patients for doctors to practice giving a diagnosis through video feed.

      https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/11/advantages-of-artificial-intelligence/

      Delete
    2. That's really interesting! I had never thought of it being used like that.

      Delete
  3. Do you know of any on-going (AI) project build on top of this technology to detect the media that has been deep-faked? I know that Adobe has been building an AI tool to detect a photo that has been Photoshopped so I'm just wondering if the same thing is happening for this Deep Fake technology https://www.technologyreview.com/f/613781/adobes-new-ai-tool-can-spot-when-a-face-has-been-photoshopped/

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes! There are current efforts to combat the advancement of this technology. Political associations are looking to protect themselves and their candidates so they are at the forefront of the push for this technology.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/24/technology/tech-companies-deepfakes.html

    ReplyDelete
  5. There's a concept in CG animation called "the uncanny valley", the idea is that even with how advanced CG art has become, its still not possible to create a model that truly feels human. If CG art and deepfakes become able to surpass this, I think it'd be terrible for everyone. Video evidence is the closest thing we have to objective truth, and if deepfakes become sophisticated enough to be indistinguishable from real life, how can we trust any recorded evidence? Not a good idea if you ask me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It becomes even more dangerous when you add in the ability to transpose fakes onto existing people. For example, Star Wars has used body doubles for Carrie Fisher in movies like Rogue One and deep faked old footage of her onto a younger actresses body to make it seem like Carrie Fisher was in her 20s again when the movie was made in the 2010s.

      Delete
  6. You have a nice writing style: your post read well and had a natural flow. This should count as a comment, but it probably won't. So, I would add that I am glad people are having a conversation of the benefits of Deep Fakes early into its advancement. Progress is good, but it should only make for a better society. Also, Tiwari's campaign's use of deep fakes is very cool. I'm from a country with hundreds of languages so I've struggled through some janky translations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Danielle! It is a very hard discussion as there are benefits truly, however like with any set of advanced technologies, if in the wrong hands could be extremely dangerous. it is a fine line we must walk to figure out what is truly worth it to create and evolve.

      Delete
  7. The deep fake would bring a lot of harm specially in today's society. I actually found out about deep fake during the situation with the Speaker of the House. It made me think of how it could be used to start wars. It's a dangers technology if it get's into hand of wrong people.

    ReplyDelete
  8. With today's massive usage of social media, a fake videos would be spread out within a snap of a finger, and it would hurt a lot of people involved. I totally agree that this technology do way more harm than good.

    ReplyDelete
  9. People already have problems trying to find out the truth for themselves. People are already getting confused by fake news, so I would believe that deep fakes would just make people believe incorrect information more than they already do.
    The only way to counter this is by saying that deep fakes will really damage society, but also just trying to educate people and having people actually take the time to find the real information.
    I believe that unless that they use the deep fakes and spread it and have many different versions of it so that doing research will leave the people who actually take the time to be informed confused, deep fakes are just another way for uninformed people to stay uninformed.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Photoshop is already dangerous when it is used to intentionally attack somebody. Therefore, I believe that deep fakes would be a much bigger threat to our society rather than an useful technology.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Self-Driving Cars: Rewards and Risks

Can AI outperform doctors?

Benefits of a Humble Intelligence